Grid connected 156.1 MW Combined Cycle Power plant at Hazira, Gujarat
#1126of 1329 in Industrial#864of 975 in India#1336of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#17of 19 in AM0029
Audit Analysis
A CDM fossil-fuel-switch project (156.1 MW combined-cycle gas plant in Gujarat, India) with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline, but undermined by 20 material findings at validation, five cross-document contradictions (including a 54% grid-EF discrepancy and a baseline-method conflict), and a first monitoring period that delivered roughly 4.2× the pro-rata ex-ante expectation. The project's core methodology (AM0029) is well-established, yet the volume of unresolved documentation gaps and contradictions materially weakens confidence in the credit quantity and baseline integrity.
Red Flags
- 20 material findings at validation, including missing DNA approval, inadequate baseline scenario justifications (lignite, nuclear, grid import), and missing financing charges in the cost calculation
- Grid emission factor discrepancy: the PDD records 593.8 (likely kg CO₂/MWh) while the monitoring report uses 0.9163 t CO₂/MWh (≈916 kg CO₂/MWh), a 54% difference that directly inflates the credit quantity
- Baseline method contradiction: the validation report describes a 'project' baseline while the monitoring report states 'jurisdictional', creating ambiguity about which baseline was actually applied
- First monitoring period ERR of 385,292 t CO₂ is approximately 4.2× the pro-rata expectation of ~91,900 t CO₂ derived from the 765,718 t CO₂ lifetime ex-ante estimate, raising over-crediting concerns
- No buffer pool, no reversal-event tracking, and no quantified leakage percentage are recorded in the available documents
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 392,561 | 0 | 392,561 | |
| Total | 392,561 | 0 | 392,561 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
Quantified but no specific % stated
Jurisdictional EF but method contradicted across docs
Mentioned; benefit sharing described; no FPIC or grievance m
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →