Vai al contenuto principale
VCS Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use India Registry: Registered Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Grouped Reforestation Project by Cropzone Agro Forestry Private Limited

VCS-2833 ↗

4.9 / 10
Integrity
6.1
Transparency
4.2
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
3.4

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified Additionality was confirmed by the VVB using a barrier test, and no material findings were reported in the verification record.

missing Baseline method, buffer pool treatment, and reversal history are not stated in available documents, limiting confidence in permanence and baseline validity.

Transparency

verified The project has a named VVB and a defined monitoring period from 2017-06-04 to 2022-02-10, which gives some MRV structure.

missing Claimed versus verified ER totals are not available, and the extraction confidence is low, so public reporting completeness appears limited.

Claim Safety

verified The project is marked as not CORSIA-eligible, which reduces dual-market claim risk.

missing Leakage is only described as negligible without a quantified deduction, and the absence of baseline and FNRB details makes over-crediting risk harder to judge.

Documentation

verified Fourteen documents were used, and the record includes a recent document date of 2024-01-27.

missing Extraction confidence is low, and several key fields are missing or not stated, including baseline, leakage, and verified issuance totals.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The verification report indicates additionality was confirmed through a barrier test, and the VVB is identified as KBS Certification Services Pvt. Ltd. No material findings or corrective actions were reported, which is positive. Still, the baseline method, buffer pool percentage, and reversal-event detail are not stated in available documents, so permanence and baseline robustness cannot be strongly credited.

Transparency

The project has a defined monitoring period and a named verifier, which supports some transparency in MRV. However, the extracted record does not provide claimed or verified ER totals, and usage monitoring details are not stated. Because min extraction confidence is low, the documentation quality is further weakened.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is helped by the fact that the project is explicitly not CORSIA-eligible, reducing one channel of double-claim risk. On the other hand, leakage is only described as negligible, without a quantified deduction, and the baseline method and FNRB information are missing. That leaves some uncertainty about over-crediting risk.

Documentation

The record draws on 14 documents and includes a recent document date, which is a modest strength. But extraction confidence is low, and several core fields are missing or not stated, including baseline, leakage deduction, buffer pool, and issuance totals. The safeguard-related contradictions also reduce confidence in the completeness of the documentation.

Overall

I privileged the later and more affirmative safeguard entries for FPIC, safeguards, benefit sharing, and grievance mechanism because the contradictions show newer documents dated 2023-04-25 and 2023-09-12 supporting those values, while the conflicting negatives are from 2022-09-20. Even so, the contradictions indicate a reliability issue, so I reduced the documentation and transparency scores. Overall, the project looks moderately credible on additionality, but missing baseline and quantification details prevent a higher score.

Audit Analysis

This is a registered VCS reforestation project with VVB-confirmed additionality and no material findings reported, which supports moderate integrity. However, key baseline, leakage, and crediting-quantification details are missing, and the record has low extraction confidence plus several safeguard-related contradictions that reduce trust in the documentation.

Project Description

Proponent: CropZone Agro Forestry Private Limited Protocol categories: Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use Protocols: AR-ACM0003 Estimated annual GHG reductions: 10673 tCO2e Region: Asia Registration date: 2023-09-12

Red Flags

  • Baseline method, leakage deduction, and buffer pool treatment are not stated in the extracted record.
  • The safeguard-related record contains contradictions across documents, including FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing, and safeguards documentation.

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2017
1,384 1,384 0
2018
3,827 3,516 311
2019
4,949 1,665 3,284
2020
5,917 4,850 1,067
2021
5,961 1,851 4,110
2022
670 507 163
Total 22,708 13,773 8,935

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Publish the baseline method, leakage treatment, buffer pool treatment, and any reversal monitoring details in a single reconciled document.
  • Provide verified issuance totals and a clearer public MRV package that resolves the safeguard contradictions and improves extraction readability.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed barrier test

Permanence

buffer pool not stated

Leakage

negligible but unquantified

Baseline

baseline method not stated

Safeguards

present but contradictory

Double-claim

not CORSIA-eligible

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-19 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti