Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Re-assessment pendingGSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticPeruRegistry: RegisteredGS-ICS-KR

GS1005 Qori Q'oncha - Improved cookstoves diffusion programme in Peru - VPA2

Developer: MICROSOL SAS

GS-43 ↗ · current registry ID: GS1049

#1401of 1734 in Industrial#66of 79 in Peru#1809of 2180 in Gold Standard (GS)#13of 17 in GS-ICS-KR

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 2 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.2 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysis

This long-running Gold Standard cookstove project in Peru has VVB-verified additionality and no reversal events, but is burdened by an extensive catalogue of material findings spanning data quality, stove durability, maintenance gaps, and double-counting risks. The 0% leakage deduction, below-threshold removal rate of old stoves, and beneficiary dismantling of project stoves raise meaningful over-crediting concerns. Documentation is voluminous (37 documents) but undermined by missing annual reports, non-public prior verifications, and dozens of unresolved corrective actions.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 37 registry documents (35 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology approved by ICVCMGS TPDDTEC

    The methodology meets the Core Carbon Principles; this project's credits do not carry the CCP label yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
13,40213,4020
2011
31,09731,0970
2012
111,428110,3391,089
2013
186,618186,6180
2014
186,013182,1663,847
2015
165,749165,70445
2016
241,592241,5920
2017
218,336212,5625,774
2018
95,29858,54336,755
2019
103,22691,43411,792
2020
112,1012,000110,101
2021
79,0571,03078,027
2022
59,906059,906
2023
32,67318,28914,384
Total1,636,4961,314,776321,720

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceTechnologies and Practices to Displace Decentralized Thermal Energy Consumption

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →