GS1205 Sustainable Energy for Development PoA, VPA 3: Improved Cook Stove Project in Brazzaville
GS-400 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2514
#684of 1329 in Industrial#1034of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
This improved cook stove project in Brazzaville, Congo, has a reasonable safeguards framework (FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing) and no material findings, but suffers from significant data gaps and internal contradictions. The project-specific baseline, unaddressed leakage, and inconsistent FNRB methodology across documents raise moderate over-crediting risk. Multiple discrepancies in ERR figures and usage rates between monitoring reports undermine confidence in the reported results.
Red Flags
- Two different verified ERR values (15,302 vs 10,529) appear in 2016 monitoring reports for what appears to be the same period, with no explanation for the discrepancy
- Leakage deduction and justification are entirely absent from all available documents despite cook stoves displacing fuel that could be redirected to other uses
- FNRB methodology is inconsistent: the PDD (2016) specifies a local field measurement while the 2019 monitoring report uses a national default, with no documented rationale for the change
- VVB name is not stated in any available document, making independent verification of additionality and monitoring results impossible to confirm
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 3,095 | 3,095 | 0 | |
| 2015 | 6,125 | 6,125 | 0 | |
| 2016 | 4,339 | 1,304 | 3,035 | |
| Total | 13,559 | 10,524 | 3,035 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test applied but VVB verification not confirmed
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
No leakage deduction or justification in any document
Project-specific baseline, no reassessment date found
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing all documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →