GS1247 VPA 142 Manicaland Safe Water

Audit Analysis

This Gold Standard cookstove/safe-water VPA in Zimbabwe has VVB-confirmed additionality and no reported reversal events, but is undermined by nine cross-document contradictions spanning leakage, fNRB, usage rates, and crediting periods. Five open Forward Action Requests, an ongoing staff investigation, and a delayed revalidation process create meaningful data-reliability concerns. The project delivered 100% of its claimed emissions reductions for the 2024 monitoring period, but the underlying parameter inconsistencies limit confidence in the credit quantities.

Project Description

Red Flags

• ⚠Nine contradictions across documents, including leakage deduction (0% in verification report vs 5% in PDD), fNRB value (0.97 vs 0.85), and crediting period (2018–2023 vs 2025–2030)
• ⚠Five open Forward Action Requests (FARs) covering SDG indicators, fNRB reporting, and monitoring applicability at VPA level remain unresolved
• ⚠Ongoing investigation into two staff members within the Zimbabwe partner organisation, as noted in the verification report
• ⚠Revalidation to transition to the ERS DWS methodology is delayed pending the Government of Zimbabwe Carbon Framework, with a deviation extension to 31 December 2024
• ⚠Leakage is treated as 'deemed negligible' with a 0% deduction in the verification report, yet the PDD (2025) specifies a 5% deduction — an unresolved inconsistency

Credit Vintages