GS1247 VPA 145 Manicaland Safe Water

Audit Analysis

This Gold Standard safe-water / improved-kitchen activity in Zimbabwe has VVB-confirmed additionality and documented safeguards (FPIC, grievance mechanism), but is undermined by ten cross-document contradictions, a 0% leakage deduction that conflicts with the PDD's 5% figure, 49.1 non-functional borehole days, open corrective actions, and the absence of a verified ERR figure. The project's data reliability is materially weakened by inconsistent values across the PDD, verification report, and monitoring report.

Project Description

Red Flags

• ⚠Ten contradictions across documents, including conflicting leakage deductions (0% vs 5%), fnrb values (0.97 vs 0.85), and usage-rate assumptions (92.37% vs 99%), undermining data reliability
• ⚠49.1 non-functional days recorded across all boreholes during the monitoring period, with temporary caps imposed on key parameters due to a Gold Standard grievance review
• ⚠No buffer pool percentage stated and reversal events marked as 'not addressed' in the verification report, leaving permanence risk unquantified
• ⚠Total ERR verified is not found in the extracted record, making it impossible to confirm whether claimed savings of 20,471 tCO₂e were actually delivered
• ⚠Three corrective actions remain open, including the need to monitor user numbers as required by the methodology and to update the usage survey to capture seasonality

Credit Vintages