GS1247 VPA 246 Kaliro Safe Water
GS-2683 ↗ · current registry ID: GS10725
#966of 1329 in Industrial#121of 163 in Uganda#1392of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
The Kaliro Safe Water project (GS10725) is a Gold Standard borehole-based safe water project in Uganda with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reported reversals, but it is burdened by an unusually large volume of material findings, data-quality errors, and cross-document contradictions that significantly undermine confidence in the reported emission reductions. The shift from a 5% quantified leakage deduction in the PDD to a 0% 'deemed negligible' treatment in the latest verification report, combined with multiple ERR figure discrepancies, raises over-crediting concerns. The project's operational record—including 183 non-functional days across boreholes in 2024 and seven boreholes failing initial water quality tests—further weakens the integrity and claim-safety profile.
Red Flags
- Twelve cross-document contradictions identified, including a 3x discrepancy in verified ERR (6,355 vs 19,671) and a shift in leakage treatment from 5% quantified (PDD, 2023) to 0% deemed negligible (verification report, 2026)
- Extensive material findings: 6 CARs, 6 CLs, multiple calculation errors, missing geo-coordinates, 183 non-functional borehole days in 2024, and 7 boreholes failing initial water quality tests
- Crediting period contradiction: 2020–2025 (verification report) vs 2025–2030 (validation report), creating ambiguity about the applicable project timeline
- Usage monitoring method inconsistent across documents: 'annual_survey' in the 2026 verification report vs 'assumed' in the 2023 monitoring report
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5,452 | 5,452 | 0 | |
| 2021 | 9,749 | 9,644 | 105 | |
| 2022 | 7,486 | 4,872 | 2,614 | |
| 2023 | 9,221 | 0 | 9,221 | |
| 2024 | 7,288 | 0 | 7,288 | |
| Total | 39,196 | 19,968 | 19,228 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
no reversals but operational fragility
0% deemed negligible; was 5% in PDD; justification thin
Project-specific; reassessed 2024; no jurisdictional benchmark
FPIC conducted; grievance mechanism present; benefit sharing described
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →