Skip to main content
GSOtherViet NamACM0002

GS1354 Vietnam Small Hydro PoA - Ea Sup 3 Hydropower Project (CPA2)

GS-408 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2539

#432of 1935 in Renewable energy#22of 80 in Vietnam#193of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#321of 1287 in ACM0002

5.9/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

The Ea Sup 3 small hydro project in Vietnam demonstrates solid additionality (investment test with IRR below benchmark, VVB-confirmed) and reasonable safeguards, but is held back by a project-specific baseline rather than a jurisdictional one, the absence of a verified ERR figure for the 2024 monitoring period, and a high volume of corrective actions (34 CARs) during validation. The project is a well-understood avoidance technology with low reversal risk, but the lack of verified monitoring data and multiple cross-document contradictions limit confidence in the claimed credit volume.

Red Flags

  • No verified ERR figure was extracted from the 2024 monitoring report, making it impossible to confirm whether the project is delivering on its ex-ante estimate of 93,814 tCO₂e
  • Baseline is project-specific rather than jurisdictional, which is a weaker basis for a hydro project and increases over-crediting risk relative to a grid-average approach
  • 34 Corrective Action Requests and 9 Clarification Requests were raised during validation, including inconsistencies in the grid emission factor and missing monitoring parameters — all closed but indicative of initial documentation gaps
  • Six cross-document contradictions identified (leakage justification, baseline method, ERR figures, additionality test type, grid EF, crediting period), most attributable to different vintages but still a data-reliability concern

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
3,40703,407
2014
12,583012,583
2015
10,353010,353
2016
10,947010,947
2017
8,71308,713
Total46,003046,003

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test, IRR below benchmark

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction, quantified justification, reasonable for hydro

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, not jurisdictional

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents