GS1354 Vietnam Small Hydro PoA - Ea Sup 3 Hydropower Project (CPA2)
GS-408 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2539
#432of 1935 in Renewable energy#22of 80 in Vietnam#193of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#321of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The Ea Sup 3 small hydro project in Vietnam demonstrates solid additionality (investment test with IRR below benchmark, VVB-confirmed) and reasonable safeguards, but is held back by a project-specific baseline rather than a jurisdictional one, the absence of a verified ERR figure for the 2024 monitoring period, and a high volume of corrective actions (34 CARs) during validation. The project is a well-understood avoidance technology with low reversal risk, but the lack of verified monitoring data and multiple cross-document contradictions limit confidence in the claimed credit volume.
Red Flags
- No verified ERR figure was extracted from the 2024 monitoring report, making it impossible to confirm whether the project is delivering on its ex-ante estimate of 93,814 tCO₂e
- Baseline is project-specific rather than jurisdictional, which is a weaker basis for a hydro project and increases over-crediting risk relative to a grid-average approach
- 34 Corrective Action Requests and 9 Clarification Requests were raised during validation, including inconsistencies in the grid emission factor and missing monitoring parameters — all closed but indicative of initial documentation gaps
- Six cross-document contradictions identified (leakage justification, baseline method, ERR figures, additionality test type, grid EF, crediting period), most attributable to different vintages but still a data-reliability concern
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 3,407 | 0 | 3,407 | |
| 2014 | 12,583 | 0 | 12,583 | |
| 2015 | 10,353 | 0 | 10,353 | |
| 2016 | 10,947 | 0 | 10,947 | |
| 2017 | 8,713 | 0 | 8,713 | |
| Total | 46,003 | 0 | 46,003 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test, IRR below benchmark
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% deduction, quantified justification, reasonable for hydro
Project-specific baseline, not jurisdictional
FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →