Skip to main content
GSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticKenyaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

GS1366 VPA 14 Kilifi Borehole Rehabilitation Project

GS-1567 ↗ · current registry ID: GS7371

#834of 1329 in Industrial#100of 157 in Kenya#1234of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.6/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.0
Claim Safety
3.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The Kilifi Borehole Rehabilitation Project has documented safeguards, FPIC, and a grievance mechanism, but suffers from a critical over-crediting concern: total claimed credits (84,658) exceed the lifetime ex-ante estimate (50,000) by 69%. Multiple contradictions between the PDD and monitoring report on leakage treatment, crediting period, and additionality test type undermine data reliability. The project-specific baseline and absence of a confirmed buffer pool further weaken the integrity profile.

Red Flags

  • Total claimed credits (84,658 per monitoring report, 2020-03) exceed the lifetime ex-ante estimate (50,000 per PDD) by 69%, indicating potential over-crediting beyond the project's design capacity
  • Crediting period is stated as 2018–2024 in the monitoring report but 2014–2028 in the PDD — a 9-year discrepancy that fundamentally changes the pro-rata credit expectation
  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the PDD (2019-10) describes leakage as 'quantified' while the monitoring report (2020-03) states it was 'deemed negligible' with a 0% deduction

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2019
7,5897,5890
Total7,5897,5890

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present but VVB confirmation not stated

Permanence

no reversal events but no permanence mechanism confirmed

Leakage

0% deduction with contradictory justification across documents

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; no reassessment date recorded

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, and benefit sharing all documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents