Skip to main content
CDMHydroChinaACM0002

Guangdong Shaoguan Yizhou Hydro Power Station

CDM-1980 ↗

#367of 1935 in Renewable energy#137of 1084 in China#235of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#271of 1287 in ACM0002

6.0/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM hydro project validated by TÜV NORD CERT with a confirmed investment additionality test and a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline. The project is straightforward in design (displacing grid electricity with hydro generation), but four cross-document contradictions in key fields—baseline method, crediting period, additionality test type, and ERR figures—introduce moderate data-reliability concerns. No reversal events, no outstanding corrective actions, and a reasonable 0% leakage deduction for a hydro displacement project support overall integrity.

Red Flags

  • Baseline method is described as 'project' in the validation report (2009) but 'jurisdictional' in the monitoring report (2012); the grid emission factor of 0.84335 (2007) supports the jurisdictional reading, but the discrepancy is unexplained.
  • Crediting period differs between the validation report (2008-11-01 to 2015-10-31) and the monitoring report (2009-03-24 to 2016-03-23), a shift of roughly four months at each end.
  • The validation report notes that baseline emission-factor calculations required modifications to NDRC data due to identified mistakes in emission factors for coke and refinery gas, indicating the initial grid EF was not fully reliable.
  • Verified ERR figure for the monitoring period (2010-11-01 to 2012-03-31) was not found in the extracted record, preventing a direct pro-rata delivery check against the 59,346 tCO₂e lifetime claim.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
33,014033,014
2011
56,127056,127
2012
59,346059,346
Total148,4870148,487

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

Hydro avoidance, no reversal events

Leakage

0% deemed negligible, consistent with type

Baseline

Jurisdictional EF but method contradicts across docs

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-30ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents