Guangxi Baise Tianlin Dongba Hydropower Station
#769of 1935 in Renewable energy#378of 1084 in China#547of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#597of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A small-scale hydro project under CDM methodology ACM0002 with a grid-emission-factor baseline and a 14-year crediting period. The project shows no reversal events and uses a standard methodology, but the extracted record lacks explicit additionality documentation, contains contradictory leakage justifications, and shows a baseline-method discrepancy between the validation and monitoring reports. Overall a moderate-quality project with manageable but unresolved documentation gaps.
Red Flags
- Additionality test type and VVB confirmation are not stated in any extracted document, despite being a mandatory CDM requirement
- Leakage justification is contradictory: the 2017 validation report deems leakage negligible while the 2022 monitoring report does not address it at all
- Baseline method is reported as 'project' in the monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the validation report, creating ambiguity about the actual baseline construction
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 42,902 | 0 | 42,902 | |
| 2023 | 1,550,659 | 0 | 1,550,659 | |
| Total | 1,593,561 | 0 | 1,593,561 |
Risk Indicators
Test not stated in extracted record
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% deduction, contradictory justification
Grid EF baseline, method label inconsistent
Mentioned but FPIC and grievance not documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
