Skip to main content
CDMHydroChinaACM0002

Guangxi Bajiangkou Hydropower Project

CDM-1596 ↗

#48of 1935 in Renewable energy#9of 1084 in China#32of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#31of 1287 in ACM0002

6.9/ 10
Integrity
7.0
Transparency
6.5
Claim Safety
7.0
Documentation
7.5

Audit Analysis

The Guangxi Bajiangkou 90 MW hydropower project demonstrates solid additionality (IRR without CERs of 6.76% well below the Chinese hurdle rate) and a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline, with verified emissions reductions closely matching claimed values (99.1% delivery). The main concerns are a contradiction in baseline method characterization between the 2011 and 2012 monitoring reports, and the absence of leakage treatment in the original validation report. Overall, this is a well-documented CDM hydro project with moderate data inconsistencies that do not fundamentally undermine the credit claims.

Red Flags

  • Baseline method described as 'project-specific' in the 2011 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2012 monitoring report — the more recent 2012 characterization is privileged, but the inconsistency raises questions about baseline robustness
  • The 2008 validation report did not address leakage at all; the 2012 monitoring report later deemed it negligible with a 0% deduction, leaving a gap in the original validation record
  • CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in any available document, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
577,8820577,882
2012
240,9870240,987
2013
243,0420243,042
Total1,061,91101,061,911

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test; IRR below hurdle

Permanence

Avoidance project; no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible; absent from validation

Baseline

Jurisdictional EF; method contradiction across reports

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC/grievance not

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-30ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents