CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalChinaRegistry: RegisteredACM0022

Guangzhou Eastern Solid Resource Recycling Center MSW Integrated treatment Plant Project

Developer: Guangzhou LEO-KING Environmental Technology Co., Ltd

VCS-2746 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#11of 3063 in China#54of 1588 in Verra (VCS)#2of 38 in ACM0022

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.5 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-13medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2023-12-31

evidence: 17/19 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Guangzhou Eastern Solid Resource Recycling Center MSW Integrated treatment Plant Project (China) treats waste by alternative processes (such as composting or anaerobic digestion) instead of landfilling (anaerobic digester with biogas stored in a gas tank at the back end of desulfurization and dehydration process, delivered to generators for generating electricity (10.34MW capacity), and an enclosed flare for residual gas if the gas tank malfunctions or its storage capacity is full) under ACM0022 Version 03.0; registry status Registered (VCS), 502,556 credits issued (vintages 2020–2022). The documents name China Classification Society Certification Co. Ltd as validation / verification body. The documents estimate 359,014 tCO2e per year. The latest verification report (01-January-2023 – 31-December-2023) verifies 320,811 tCO2e. Credits issued so far are 50% of the ex-ante estimate for the crediting period elapsed.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 19 registry documents (17 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Pilot phase only (2021–2023)

    Eligible only for the pilot phase: not usable for the current 2024–2026 phase.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology under ICVCM assessmentACM0022

    The Integrity Council has not decided on this methodology yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2020
113,50754,97858,529
2021
219,04928,133190,916
2022
170,00015,101154,899
Total502,55698,212404,344

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2020–2021ACM0022 v3.0current version

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2022ACM0022 v3.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2023ACM0022 v3.0current version

    monitoring report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0022: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+23)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0022 Version 03.0
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →