Guodian Shaanxi Jingbian Jishanliang 49.5MW Wind Farm Project
#1020of 1935 in Renewable energy#562of 1084 in China#755of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#803of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A 49.5 MW CDM wind project in China with VVB-confirmed additionality (combined investment and barrier test) and a standard methodology (ACM0002), but undermined by five inter-document contradictions, over twenty material findings at validation, three unresolved corrective actions, and the absence of a verified ERR figure. The project's avoidance-based design limits permanence risk, yet the baseline-method discrepancy and missing FNRB data create meaningful over-crediting uncertainty.
Red Flags
- Five contradictions between the 2012 validation report and the 2021 monitoring report, including baseline method (project vs jurisdictional), crediting period dates, and cumulative ERR (298,844 vs 260,588 tCO₂e), indicating inconsistent record-keeping across the project lifecycle.
- Twenty-plus material findings (CAR-1 through CL-11a) were raised at validation, and three corrective actions (LoAs, project procedures, IRR spreadsheet) remain unresolved, suggesting the additionality and financial viability evidence was incomplete at approval.
- No verified ERR figure is available in the extracted record; only a claimed lifetime total of 298,844 tCO₂e is present, making independent over-crediting assessment impossible.
- FNRB method and value are not stated in any available document, leaving the net-benefit calculation unverifiable.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 260,588 | 0 | 260,588 | |
| 2021 | 298,844 | 0 | 298,844 | |
| Total | 559,432 | 0 | 559,432 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Avoidance project, no reversals
0% deduction, quantified justification
Method contradictory across docs
Mentioned but details absent
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →