Guohua Chicheng Dushikou West Wind Farm Project
#257of 1935 in Renewable energy#91of 1084 in China#160of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#187of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A standard CDM wind farm project in China using the well-established ACM0002 methodology, with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline. The project shows no reversal risk (inherent to wind displacement of grid electricity) and a defensible 0% leakage deduction, but documentation gaps on safeguards, grievance mechanisms, and verified emission-reduction figures limit confidence. Several inter-document contradictions exist but are largely explainable by differing time bases or document roles.
Red Flags
- No FPIC or grievance mechanism is recorded in any available document, creating a safeguards gap
- The verified emission-reduction figure for the monitoring period is absent from the extracted record, preventing independent cross-check of the claimed 721,987 tCO2e lifetime estimate
- Grid emission factor is fixed at the 2007 value (0.9502) with no evidence of periodic update or sensitivity analysis beyond the one corrective action noted
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 26,444 | 0 | 26,444 | |
| 2014 | 160,932 | 0 | 160,932 | |
| Total | 187,376 | 0 | 187,376 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction, deemed negligible (wind)
Jurisdictional grid EF (0.9502, 2007)
Mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →