Guohua Xinbaerhu Zuoqi Phase I 49.5MW Wind Farm Project

Audit Analysis

A 49.5 MW CDM wind farm in China with VVB-confirmed additionality and a standardised methodology (ACM0002 v10), but undermined by eight material findings at validation, three outstanding corrective actions, and unresolved contradictions in baseline method, leakage justification, and lifetime ERR figures across monitoring reports. The absence of verified ERR data, FNRB details, and any permanence buffer limits confidence in the credit's integrity and transparency.

Project Description

Red Flags

• ⚠Eight material findings at validation (CAR-1, CL-1 through CL-7) including errors in investment analysis units, project start-date compliance, and monitoring equipment accuracy, with three corrective actions still listed as required
• ⚠Lifetime ERR figure contradicts between two monitoring reports: 132,344 tCO₂e (2013 report) vs 82,486 tCO₂e (2011 report) — a 60 % discrepancy with no documented reconciliation
• ⚠Baseline method is stated as 'project-specific' in the 2013 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2010 validation report, creating ambiguity about the counterfactual
• ⚠Total verified ERR is not reported in any available document, preventing independent confirmation of actual emissions reductions

Credit Vintages