Hanergy Pizhou Solar PV Power Co., Ltd 30MW PV Power Station Project
#221of 1935 in Renewable energy#75of 1084 in China#135of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#158of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A 30 MW solar PV project in Pizhou, China, registered under CDM with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and a standard grid-emission-factor baseline. The project is fundamentally sound as an avoidance-type renewable energy credit, but data reliability is undermined by three cross-document contradictions (baseline method, leakage justification, and ERR figures) and a corrective action on common-practice demonstration. Several key fields (verified ERR, buffer pool, FPIC, grievance mechanism) are absent from the extracted record, limiting full assurance.
Red Flags
- Baseline method is characterised as 'project' in the 2016 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2012 validation report — an inconsistency that undermines confidence in the baseline definition
- One Corrective Action Request was issued for inadequate common-practice demonstration, requiring the project to apply the CDM 'Guidelines on common practice' v02.0
- Leakage justification is contradictory: the validation report (2012) deems leakage negligible while the monitoring report (2016) states it was quantified, yet the deduction is 0% in both cases
- Total ERR figures differ substantially between documents (92,940 in the monitoring report vs 215,010 in the validation report); while likely reflecting different time bases, the discrepancy is not explicitly reconciled in the available record
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 92,940 | 0 | 92,940 | |
| Total | 92,940 | 0 | 92,940 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% deduction, contradictory justification
Method contradiction across documents
Mentioned but FPIC/grievance not detailed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →