Skip to main content
CDMMethane avoidanceIndonesiaAMS-III.H

Harapan Biogas Project

CDM-4394 ↗

#172of 268 in Biogas#23of 33 in Indonesia#1169of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#33of 55 in AMS-III.H

4.5/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
4.2

Audit Analysis

The Harapan Biogas Project is a CDM methane-avoidance project (AMS-III.H) in Indonesia with VVB-confirmed additionality via an investment test, but it carries a heavy burden of 17 material findings and 15 corrective actions that raise concerns about the robustness of its PDD and investment justification. The absence of a buffer pool, verified ERR figure, and several key monitoring parameters, combined with a contradiction in the leakage justification between the validation and monitoring reports, limits confidence in the project's long-term integrity and transparency.

Red Flags

  • 17 material findings and 15 corrective actions required at validation, including unsubstantiated capital investment costs, missing investment approval from Cargill Temasek Palm management, and an incorrect description of the methane conversion factor (MCFww,treatment,PJ,aerobic)
  • No buffer pool or permanence mechanism identified in available documents, leaving reversal risk unaddressed for a 7-year crediting period
  • Contradiction in leakage justification: the validation report (2011) states leakage was 'deemed negligible' while the monitoring report (2013) states it was 'quantified', yet the deduction remains 0% in both cases
  • Total ERR claimed differs by a factor of 10 between the validation report (139,433) and the monitoring report (13,925); while likely reflecting lifetime vs. first-year scope, the discrepancy was not explicitly reconciled in the documents
  • No verified ERR figure, FNRB method, or usage monitoring method found in the extracted record

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction; justification inconsistent across docs

Baseline

Project-specific, measured; reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; no FPIC or grievance mechanism documen

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-31AMS-III.H

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents