CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSavoidanceChinaRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Hebei Chengde Weichang Yudaokou Pasture 150MW Wind Farm Project

Developer: Hebei Construction Investment New Energy Co., Ltd

VCS-892 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#494of 5087 in Renewable energy#175of 3065 in China#399of 1608 in Verra (VCS)#386of 3484 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.7 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-16medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2023-05-31

evidence: 33/41 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Hebei Chengde Weichang Yudaokou Pasture 150MW Wind Farm Project (China) generates grid-connected renewable electricity (wind, 150MW) under ACM0002 version 20.0; registry status Registered (VCS), 2,083,002 credits issued (vintages 2010–2020). The documents name Shenzhen CTI International Certification Co., Ltd as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (01/06/2022 – 31/05/2023) verifies 273,055 tCO2e. The latest monitoring period achieved 106% of its ex-ante estimate (per the monitoring report).

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 41 registry documents (33 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-25

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2010
48,37448,3740
2011
87,05387,0530
2012
380,769380,7690
2015
83,09883,0980
2016
332,434332,4340
2017
373,876373,8760
2018
339,116339,1160
2019
379,412242,335137,077
2020
58,87048,86010,010
Total2,083,0021,935,915147,087

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2010–2011ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2011–2012ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2015–2020ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2020–2021ACM0002version not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report + verification report

  5. 2021–2022ACM0002 v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2022–2023ACM0002 v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. Period not statedACM0002 v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+4)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Carbonmarksold out

checked on 25 Oct 2026

↗
+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002 version 20.0
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →