Hebei Kangbao Sanxiatian Wind Farm Project
#52of 1935 in Renewable energy#12of 1084 in China#34of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#35of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A CDM wind farm project with solid additionality (combined test confirmed by BVCH) and no inherent reversal risk, delivering approximately 93% of the pro-rata expected emissions reductions for the 2013–2015 monitoring period. The main concerns are a contradiction in baseline method classification between the validation report and the later monitoring report, and the absence of explicit CORSIA/CCP status documentation. Overall a low-risk renewable energy project with minor documentation gaps.
Red Flags
- Baseline method is described as 'project-specific' in the 2016 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2010 validation report — the classification discrepancy is unresolved in the extracted record
- Leakage justification is stated as 'deemed negligible' in the validation report but 'not addressed' in the 2016 monitoring report, leaving the 0% deduction without a reaffirmed basis in the most recent document
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in any available document, leaving dual-channel risk unassessed
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 139,141 | 0 | 139,141 | |
| 2016 | 342,882 | 0 | 342,882 | |
| Total | 482,023 | 0 | 482,023 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test, VVB-confirmed
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% deduction, justification inconsistent across docs
Method classification contradicts between reports
Mentioned but FPIC/grievance not detailed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
