Skip to main content
CDMBiomass EnergyChinaAMS-I.C

Heilongjiang Renhe Biomass Cogeneration Project

CDM-7485 ↗

#144of 352 in Biomass#800of 1084 in China#1048of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#44of 115 in AMS-I.C

4.7/ 10
Integrity
6.0
Transparency
3.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.0

Audit Analysis

A CDM biomass cogeneration project validated by DNV in 2012 using the simplified AMS-I.C. methodology, with a solid investment-test additionality assessment and all validation findings resolved. However, the available record contains only validation-stage documents with no monitoring reports or verified emission reductions, and a significant discrepancy exists between the PDD's claimed 99,253 tCO₂e and the VVB-validated 14,179 tCO₂e, limiting confidence in the project's actual delivery.

Red Flags

  • Major discrepancy in total emission reductions: the PDD (2012-07-02) states 99,253 tCO₂e while the validation report (2012-07-19) validates only 14,179 tCO₂e — a roughly 7-fold difference that undermines confidence in the project's claimed impact.
  • No buffer pool or permanence mechanism is stated in any available document, leaving reversal risk (e.g., plant decommissioning) unaddressed.
  • No monitoring reports or verified emission reduction figures are present in the extracted record, making it impossible to confirm actual delivery against the validated baseline.
  • Baseline method is contradictory across documents: the validation report describes a project-specific baseline while an appendix references a jurisdictional baseline.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test verified by DNV

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deduction, deemed negligible — reasonable for biomass cog

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; method contradicted in appendix

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not do

Double-claim

CCP and CORSIA status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-31AMS-I.C.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents