Helanshan Phase V 40.5MW Wind-farm Project
#220of 1084 in China#338of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#385of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A 40.5 MW onshore wind project in China registered under CDM (ACM0002 v17.0) with a 7-year crediting period. The project delivered approximately 67% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, indicating conservative crediting. Key gaps include the absence of explicit additionality documentation in the extracted record, a contradiction in baseline methodology between the validation and monitoring reports, and missing safeguards details (FPIC, grievance mechanism).
Red Flags
- Additionality test type and VVB confirmation are not stated in any extracted document, despite being a mandatory CDM requirement
- Baseline methodology is contradictory: the validation report (2017) describes a jurisdictional baseline while the monitoring report (2020) labels it 'project'
- Leakage justification is inconsistent: the validation report deems leakage negligible, but the monitoring report does not address leakage at all
- Crediting period start date differs between the monitoring report (2017-07-02) and the appendix (2017-02-07)
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 93,712 | 0 | 93,712 | |
| 2013 | 58,993 | 0 | 58,993 | |
| 2016 | 199,241 | 0 | 199,241 | |
| 2021 | 202,116 | 0 | 202,116 | |
| Total | 554,062 | 0 | 554,062 |
Risk Indicators
Not explicitly documented in extracted record
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% deduction, justified as negligible
Jurisdictional grid EF, method contradiction noted
Mentioned but FPIC and grievance not detailed
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →