Skip to main content
CDMEE own generationChinaAMS-III.Q

Henan Taiyangshi 5MW Cement Waste Heat Recovery Project

CDM-4622 ↗

#470of 617 in Industrial#962of 1181 in China#1172of 1514 in CDM (UNFCCC)#3of 6 in AMS-III.Q

4.5/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
3.5
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
3.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM cement waste-heat-recovery project validated in 2012 with a confirmed investment-test additionality assessment by TÜV Rheinland, but the available record is limited to the validation stage with no monitoring reports, a stale 2006 grid emission factor, and a project-specific baseline. The ERR figure discrepancy between the PDD and validation report is resolved in favour of the later, more specific validation report, but the overall evidence base is thin and extraction confidence is low.

Red Flags

  • Grid emission factor of 0.85285 tCO2/MWh is drawn from 2006 data; China's grid has become substantially cleaner since then, meaning the claimed reductions are likely overstated relative to current conditions.
  • No monitoring reports or verified ERR figures are present in the extracted record, so actual delivery against the 22,879 tCO2e/yr claim cannot be confirmed.
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated 'low', indicating at least one key document was poorly readable, which undermines confidence in the extracted facts.
  • The PDD lists a total ERR of 228,790 tCO2e/yr while the validation report states 22,879 tCO2e/yr — a tenfold discrepancy that, although resolved by the later validation report, signals a data-quality weakness in the project documentation.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test confirmed by VVB

Permanence

No buffer pool or reversal data found

Leakage

0% deemed negligible, reasonable for type

Baseline

Project-specific, 2006 grid EF

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned, FPIC not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-31AMS-III.Q

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents