Hua'an Xipi Hydropower Project
#1123of 1935 in Renewable energy#637of 1084 in China#861of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#876of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The Hua'an Xipi run-of-river hydropower project (CDM-1275) displaces grid electricity and has a confirmed investment-test additionality verified by JACO CDM. However, the project-specific baseline, a 0% leakage deduction with inconsistent justification across documents, and a significant discrepancy in claimed ERR figures between two monitoring reports (116,161 vs 160,788 tCO2e) introduce moderate uncertainty. The project is a closed CDM registration with no buffer pool, no reversal events, and a fixed 2008 grid emission factor appropriate for the crediting period.
Red Flags
- Claimed ERR differs by approximately 38% between the 2010 monitoring report (160,788 tCO2e) and the 2011 monitoring report (116,161 tCO2e), with no documented explanation for the revision
- Leakage justification is inconsistent: the validation report (2007) states 'deemed negligible' while the 2012 monitoring report states 'quantified', yet the deduction remains 0% in both cases
- Three corrective actions were required at validation, including a change to the coal consumption rate for Build Margin calculation (320 gce/kWh) and a revision to the monitoring plan for grid connection mode
- Baseline method is described as 'project-specific' in the 2012 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the PDD, creating ambiguity about the actual baseline construction
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 287,595 | 0 | 287,595 | |
| 2012 | 116,161 | 0 | 116,161 | |
| 2013 | 154,253 | 0 | 154,253 | |
| Total | 558,009 | 0 | 558,009 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% deduction, inconsistent justification
Project-specific, method ambiguous
Mentioned but FPIC/grievance not detailed
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →