Huade Daditaihong 49.5MW Wind Power Project
#562of 1935 in Renewable energy#264of 1084 in China#382of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#432of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A 49.5 MW onshore wind project in China under CDM methodology ACM0002 with VVB-confirmed additionality and inherently low permanence risk (avoidance-type). However, the project carries 12 material findings and 12 corrective actions from validation, multiple cross-document contradictions on baseline method and crediting period, and several key MRV parameters (FNRB, usage rates, buffer pool) are absent from the extracted record, limiting confidence in the credit's robustness.
Red Flags
- 12 material findings at validation, including a metering deficiency (main and backup meters unable to independently monitor project electricity due to Phase II connection) and multiple IRR/benchmark inconsistencies between the PDD, IRR sheet, and financial sustainability report
- Baseline method described as 'project' in the 2012 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2009 validation report — an unresolved definitional contradiction that affects baseline credibility
- Grid emission factor dated 2006 (1.0548 tCO2/MWh) with a corrective action to update to July 2008 NDRC values, indicating the baseline was built on outdated data at the time of validation
- FNRB value, usage monitoring method, and buffer pool percentage are all absent from the extracted record, leaving key MRV parameters unverifiable
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 79,042 | 0 | 79,042 | |
| 2012 | 104,202 | 0 | 104,202 | |
| 2013 | 109,577 | 0 | 109,577 | |
| Total | 292,821 | 0 | 292,821 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
Avoidance project, no reversal risk
0% with quantified justification
Method contradiction; 2006-vintage grid EF
Mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →