Huadian Daan Fengshuishan Phase I Wind Farm Project
#867of 1935 in Renewable energy#458of 1084 in China#622of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#680of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A CDM wind farm project with a VVB-verified combined additionality test and a standard jurisdictional grid baseline, but the available record is limited to validation-era documents with no monitoring or verification reports. A significant discrepancy in the claimed emission reduction figure between the PDD and the validation report, combined with the absence of any verified delivery data, limits confidence in the project's actual performance.
Red Flags
- The PDD reports a lifetime ERR of 699,874 tCO2 while the validation report (later, VVB-verified) states 99,982 tCO2 — a roughly 7× discrepancy that is unexplained in the available documents.
- No monitoring report or verification report is present in the extracted record, so actual delivery against the claimed figure cannot be assessed.
- Leakage treatment is contradictory: the validation report states leakage was 'deemed negligible' (0% deduction) while an appendix references a 'quantified' approach, leaving the actual treatment ambiguous.
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
No monitoring data to confirm asset integrity
0% deduction; justification contradicts appendix
Jurisdictional grid EF, standard for wind
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
