Huadian Da’an Fengshuishan Phase III Wind Farm Project

Audit Analysis

A CDM wind project in China with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and a jurisdictional baseline, but severely limited by the absence of any monitoring data, a low extraction confidence rating, and six material documentation findings at validation. The ERR figures in the PDD and validation report differ by a factor of seven, which is consistent with an annual-versus-lifetime presentation difference rather than a true discrepancy, but the overall evidentiary record is thin.

Project Description

Red Flags

• ⚠Total ERR claimed differs by a factor of 7 between the PDD (652,260 tCO₂e) and the validation report (93,180 tCO₂e); while arithmetically consistent with a 7-year crediting period, the lack of a monitoring report to confirm actual delivery leaves the claim unverified.
• ⚠Six material findings (two CARs, four CLs) at validation, including missing DNA Letters of Approval and incomplete PDD descriptions of O&M costs and grid-connection details.
• ⚠No monitoring report, verified ERR, or monitoring period is present in the extracted record, so actual credit delivery cannot be assessed.
• ⚠Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing reliability of the extracted data.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.