Skip to main content
CDMWindChinaACM0002

Huadian Inner Mongolia Tongliao Kailu Jieji Wind Farm Project

CDM-5481 ↗

#969of 1935 in Renewable energy#525of 1084 in China#713of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#762of 1287 in ACM0002

5.2/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

A CDM wind farm project with a solid investment-test additionality assessment verified by TÜV NORD, but undermined by ten material findings at validation, four cross-document contradictions (baseline method, leakage justification, ERR figures, crediting period), and the absence of a verified ERR figure. The project is inherently low-risk in terms of permanence and leakage (wind displacing grid electricity), yet the documentation quality and data gaps limit confidence in the overall credit quality.

Red Flags

  • Ten material findings at validation, including IRR calculation errors, an incomplete list of similar projects for common-practice analysis, and a pending host-country approval letter at the time of site validation
  • Four contradictions between the validation report, PDD, and monitoring report covering baseline method, leakage justification, total ERR, and crediting period dates
  • No verified ERR figure is available in the extracted record; only the claimed figure of 58,383 tCO₂e from the first monitoring period is present
  • Monitoring period dates are internally inconsistent (end date 2012-09-30 precedes start date 2012-10-03), indicating a clerical error in the monitoring report

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction, justification contradicted across docs

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF, but method label contradicted

Safeguards

Mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism not detailed

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents