Skip to main content
CDMWindChinaACM0002

Huadian Ningxia Ningdong Phase 4 49.5MW Wind Farm Project

CDM-6060 ↗

#784of 1935 in Renewable energy#399of 1084 in China#564of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#614of 1287 in ACM0002

5.4/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
5.5
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A 49.5 MW onshore wind project in Ningxia, China, validated under CDM with a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and a standard grid-emission-factor baseline. The project is inherently low-risk (avoidance-type, no reversal exposure), but the extracted record contains only the validation-stage documentation with no monitoring or verification reports, and three material contradictions between the PDD and validation report reduce confidence in the final credit figures.

Red Flags

  • Grid emission factor contradiction: the validation report uses 0.89635 tCO₂/MWh (2011) while an appendix lists 1.0001 tCO₂/MWh; the higher value would inflate claimed reductions by roughly 12% if it had been applied.
  • Total ERR discrepancy: the validation report states 89,068 tCO₂e while the PDD states 623,476 tCO₂e; the basis (per-period vs. lifetime) is not clarified in either document, making it impossible to confirm the correct ex-ante estimate.
  • Baseline method contradiction: the validation report classifies the baseline as project-specific, whereas the PDD describes it as jurisdictional; the two characterisations carry different robustness implications.
  • No monitoring or verification reports were found in the extracted record, so actual delivery against the ex-ante estimate cannot be assessed.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible, consistent for wind

Baseline

Project-specific, method contradicts PDD

Safeguards

Mentioned but no FPIC or grievance record

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-04ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents