*Huadian Ningxia Ningdong Yangjiayao 45MW Wind-farm Project preCDM VERs
GS-1085 ↗ · current registry ID: GS616
#310of 1084 in China#339of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#494of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A 45 MW wind project in Ningxia, China, verified by TÜV SÜD under Gold Standard with a jurisdictional baseline and combined additionality test. The first monitoring period delivered roughly 53% of the pro-rata lifetime expectation, partly explained by severe winter weather, and the 0% leakage deduction is supported but described inconsistently across documents. Several key data points (FNRB, usage monitoring, CORSIA/CCP status) are absent from the extracted record, limiting confidence in the full MRV picture.
Red Flags
- Leakage justification is described as 'quantified' in the verification report but 'deemed negligible' in the monitoring report, creating ambiguity about whether a quantitative assessment was actually performed.
- The first monitoring period delivered only ~53% of the pro-rata lifetime expectation (22,823 vs ~43,500 tCO₂e), and while weather is cited, the gap is not fully explained.
- Additionality was assessed via a combined test, but explicit VVB confirmation of the additionality finding is not stated in the extracted record.
Credit Vintages Exhausted
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 834 | 834 | 0 | |
| 2008 | 21,989 | 21,989 | 0 | |
| Total | 22,823 | 22,823 | 0 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test present; VVB confirmation not explicitly stated
Wind avoidance – no reversal risk
0% deduction; justification worded inconsistently across docs
Jurisdictional grid EF (0.98768, 2007)
Safeguards and benefit-sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
