⚠
This rating is archived — the project is no longer listed or its registry
data has changed. This is the last published analysis (2026-08-11).
5.6/ 10
Integrity
7.0
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
3.5
Score Breakdown
integrity
transparency
claim_safety
documentation
Detailed Analysis
▼
Integrity
Transparency
Claim Safety
Documentation
Overall
Audit Analysis
The project demonstrates solid additionality verification under the CDM framework, but overall quality is constrained by outdated documentation, a project-specific baseline, and missing monitoring data. Initial validation inconsistencies were resolved, supporting moderate claim safety despite limited recent transparency.
Project Description
Red Flags
⚠Missing monitoring reports and verified emission reduction figures limit current performance assessment
⚠Initial validation identified inconsistencies in boiler efficiency assumptions and monitoring plan alignment
⚠Low extraction confidence indicates potential data quality issues in source documents
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
What would improve this score
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.