*Keltepe Wind Farm Project , Turkey

Integrity

The verification report (2025-07-25) shows additionality confirmed via an investment test and names the VVB (KBS Certification Services Ltd.), and the baseline was reassessed in 2023, which are positive. However, there are many corrective action requests from validation and verification (multiple CARs listed) and contradictions in the record about reversal events and leakage treatment (see contradictions), which reduce confidence in baseline validity, leakage handling and permanence. Leakage deduction is recorded as 0% in the extracted facts, but documents disagree on whether leakage was addressed, so permanence and leakage treatment are uncertain.

Transparency

The project provides a monitoring period (2022-05-03 — 2023-07-09) and methodology details (ACM0002 Ver.20.0) which support transparency. Conversely, key verified quantities such as total emissions reductions claimed and verified are not present in the extracted record, the FNRB method/value is not stated, and evidence documents are listed as 'unknown'. The minimum extraction confidence is low, further weakening transparency.

Claim Safety

There is a tangible risk of claim issues: the project is indicated as CORSIA-eligible which raises double-claim concerns, and baseline is project-specific rather than jurisdictional. The leakage deduction of 0% is asserted but contradicted elsewhere, and no FNRB value or usage monitoring details are provided — all increase over-crediting risk. The named methodology and baseline reassessment mitigate some risk but not enough to offset missing/contradictory data.

Documentation

Documentation depth is mixed: 29 documents were used and the VVB is named, with the crediting period and monitoring period provided. Nonetheless, the extracted evidence_docs label is 'unknown', min_extraction_confidence is low, and numerous CARs/clarifications were raised (though many were closed). The combination of low extraction confidence and outstanding clarity required by corrective actions reduces the documentation score.

Overall

Scores reflect a project with several credible procedures in place (VVB review, baseline reassessment, FPIC, grievance mechanism) but significant weaknesses in data completeness and consistency. Contradictions must be resolved: (1) additionality test type — the most recent verification report (2025-07-25) reports an investment test, but an earlier document (2020-10-14) referenced a barrier test; I privileged the most recent verification report for scoring because it is the latest VVB-verified statement; (2) leakage justification — the verification report (2025-07-25) states leakage is deemed negligible whereas an earlier report (2023-10-18) said leakage was not addressed; I privileged the 2025 verification but downgraded scores for inconsistency; (3) reversal events — there is a report of reversals in 2024-11-12 but the 2025 verification states reversal events were not addressed; because this conflicts, I treated reversal treatment as unresolved and lowered permanence scoring; (4) crediting period — the 2025 verification retains the original 2016–2023 period while a 2023 document proposes 2023–2030; I privileged the latest verification filing but flagged the inconsistency. The low extraction confidence and missing numeric verification outputs further reduce overall confidence.