CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
Re-assessment pendingGSWindTurkeyRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Kores Kocadag Wind Power Project, Turkey

Developer: Innores Elektrik Uretim A.S

GS-1049 ↗ · current registry ID: GS601

Worked comparison example (English)

#283of 5087 in Renewable energy#64of 431 in Türkiye#302of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#236of 3484 in ACM0002

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 5 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.9 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-09-05medium confidence

evidence: 25/31 registry documents analyzed · 4 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

The Kores Kocadag Wind Power Project is a standard Gold Standard wind project with VVB-confirmed additionality, no material findings, and monitoring results closely tracking the ex-ante expectation. The main concerns are a project-specific baseline (contradicting a jurisdictional reference in the monitoring report), reversal events that were not explicitly addressed, and the absence of CORSIA/CCP eligibility clarification. Overall, the project presents a moderate-risk profile typical of utility-scale wind in Turkey.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 5 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 31 registry documents (25 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-04

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
9519510
2010
28,55128,5510
2011
29,01029,0100
2012
30,33930,3390
2013
34,39234,3920
2014
27,89927,8990
2015
43,59343,5930
2016
49,31549,3150
2017
39,57239,5720
2018
37,99237,91775
2019
40,63140,6310
2020
41,53331,53310,000
2021
45,87510,00035,875
2022
45,03444,134900
2023
36,6094336,566
2024
51,331051,331
2025
47,199047,199
Total629,826447,880181,946

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2020ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2021ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2022ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2023ACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2023–2024ACM0002 v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. Period not statedACM0002 v17.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →