Kuyulukoyak WIND POWER PLANT
GS-2579 ↗ · current registry ID: GS7734
#709of 1935 in Renewable energy#144of 295 in Turkey#379of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#550of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The Kuyulukoyak Wind Power Plant is a straightforward wind-energy avoidance project under Gold Standard with a sound jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline and no reversal risk. However, the project carries a heavy list of 18 corrective actions (including a retroactive-project justification gap and unperformed FPIC), a direct contradiction on whether the VVB actually verified additionality, and several editorial inconsistencies in the PDD that collectively moderate confidence in the credit's robustness.
Red Flags
- 18 corrective actions remain open, including the requirement to 'demonstrate prior consideration or justify exemption for retroactive project' — a fundamental additionality concern for a wind plant that may have been built before the PDD was filed.
- Direct contradiction between the 2022 monitoring report (VVB did NOT verify additionality) and the 2026 validation report (VVB DID verify additionality); the inconsistency undermines confidence in the additionality claim.
- FPIC was not conducted (stated as false in the record), and the PDD was required to provide a Local Stakeholder Consultation summary and Grievance Mechanism details as a corrective action — indicating these were missing at validation.
- The PDD contains editorial inconsistencies in title, dates, turbine count, capacity, and footnotes, and the project developer was required to correct the PDD template usage (developer name, host country, eligibility criteria).
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 20,915 | 0 | 20,915 | |
| 2022 | 19,213 | 370 | 18,843 | |
| 2023 | 283 | 0 | 283 | |
| Total | 40,411 | 370 | 40,041 |
Risk Indicators
Investment test claimed; VVB verification contradicted across reports; retroactive justification outstanding
Avoidance project (wind); no reversal events reported
0 % deduction; deemed negligible for wind; minor wording inconsistency across docs
Jurisdictional grid-EF baseline (appropriate) but method label contradicted in monitoring report; grid EF updated to 2023
Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC not conducted; stakeholder consultation summary was a corrective action
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents; no evidence of dual issuance found
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →