Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Re-assessment pendingGSSmall, Low - Impact HydroHondurasRegistry: RegisteredAMS-I.D

La Esperanza Hydroelectric Project

Developer: Consorcio de Inversiones S.A. (CISA)

GS-677 ↗ · current registry ID: GS395

#3805of 5087 in Renewable energy#27of 48 in Honduras#1443of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#1430of 2004 in AMS-I.D

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 5 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.8 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysis

La Esperanza is a long-running (since 2010) small hydro project in Honduras with verified additionality and no reversal risk, but it is burdened by an unusually large volume of material findings and corrective actions across multiple verification cycles, a 0% leakage deduction with no stated justification, and a 2023 monitoring period that delivered only about 54% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation. The project's core avoidance logic is sound, but data-quality and documentation issues significantly erode confidence in the reported figures.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 5 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 35 registry documents (33 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMAMS-I.D

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
14,072014,072
2007
12,072012,072
2008
20,732020,732
2009
14,748014,748
2010
29,151029,151
2011
32,328032,328
2012
22,741022,741
2013
20,719020,719
2014
20,294020,294
2015
15,814015,814
2016
12,940012,940
2017
26,9826,38720,595
2018
27,22613,61313,613
2019
16,284016,284
2020
27,755027,755
Total313,85820,000293,858

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2005–2006AMS-I.D v4.0since replaced by v18.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2007AMS-I.Dversion not confirmed in the document text

    verification report

  3. 2008–2009AMS-I.D v4.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2009–2010AMS-I.D v4.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2010–2011AMS-I.D v16.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2012AMS-I.D v16.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2013–2014AMS-I.D v16.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2015–2016AMS-I.D v16.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2017AMS-I.D v16.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  10. 2017–2018AMS-I.Dversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report + verification report

  11. 2019–2020AMS-I.D v18.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  12. 2023AMS-I.Dversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  • AMS-I.D: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS I.D.: Grid connected renewable electricity generation

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →