Luangwa Community Forests Project
#149of 261 in Soil carbon#23of 33 in Zambia#1006of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#4of 9 in VM0009
Audit Analysis
The Luangwa Community Forests Project is a long-running VCS ALM project (since 2015) with confirmed additionality and a 21% buffer pool, but it is burdened by a 30% verification discount, extensive material findings, multiple methodology deviations, and a severe pro-rata under-delivery of only ~5–8% of the ex-ante lifetime expectation for the elapsed monitoring period. Data reliability is further undermined by contradictions in ERR figures and buffer pool percentages across verification reports, and the reversal-event assessment is inconsistent between the main report and its appendix.
Red Flags
- 30% discount applied to gross verified volume because the VVB could not close PRR finding #9 (insufficient data), significantly reducing credit integrity
- Pro-rata under-delivery: verified ERR of ~2.37 M tCO2e over 8.7 years represents only ~5.5% of the pro-rata expectation (~42.8 M tCO2e) derived from the 148 M tCO2e lifetime ex-ante estimate
- Contradiction in total ERR claimed: 3,004,873 (2025-06-16 report) vs 2,373,847 (2025-06-18 report) — a 21% discrepancy between documents two days apart
- Reversal-event assessment is inconsistent: the main verification report states 'none reported' while the appendix (same date) states 'not addressed'
- SOC carbon pool excluded from multiple monitoring periods due to invalid or delayed data, reducing the comprehensiveness of the carbon accounting
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 444,249 | 433,358 | 10,891 | |
| 2016 | 880,170 | 805,119 | 75,051 | |
| 2017 | 1,089,501 | 864,247 | 225,254 | |
| 2018 | 991,028 | 820,989 | 170,039 | |
| 2019 | 1,355,238 | 1,355,238 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 1,458,359 | 1,458,359 | 0 | |
| 2021 | 1,765,037 | 1,765,037 | 0 | |
| 2022 | 1,385,414 | 1,385,414 | 0 | |
| 2023 | 2,468,500 | 2,468,500 | 0 | |
| Total | 11,837,496 | 11,356,261 | 481,235 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
21% buffer, no reversals in main doc but appendix inconsistent
0% deduction, 'quantified' justification, no independent verification
Project-specific baseline, reassessed 2023
FPIC and grievance mechanism present, but incomplete reporting noted
CORSIA not stated, CCP not mentioned — dual-channel risk unassessed
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
