Vai al contenuto principale
GS Other Cameroon Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Municipal Waste Composting in Dschang, Cameroon

GS-819 ↗

5.9 / 10
Integrity
6.2
Transparency
5.4
Claim Safety
5.8
Documentation
6.0

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified Additionality was tested using a barrier approach and was confirmed by the VVB, which supports the project’s core eligibility case.

missing Leakage is only described as negligible with a 0% deduction, while reversal handling is not addressed and no buffer pool percentage is stated.

Transparency

verified The project has a named verifier, SustainCERT, and a defined monitoring period for 2024, which helps anchor the reporting window.

missing Key MRV fields are missing, including verified usage rates, usage-monitoring method, and any quantified ERR totals in the extracted record.

Claim Safety

verified The VVB-confirmed additionality and a 0% leakage deduction reduce the immediate over-crediting concern.

missing The project is marked as CORSIA-eligible, and the record does not provide CCP status or a verified baseline reassessment, leaving some claim-risk unresolved.

Documentation

verified The record draws on multiple document types, including a verification report, monitoring report, PDD, and appendix, with 20 documents used.

missing Extraction confidence is only medium, and several important items are not stated, including buffer pool coverage, baseline reassessment timing, and verified ERR totals.

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The verification report from 2023-09-21 confirms additionality through a barrier test and says SustainCERT served as the VVB, which is a strong positive. The project also uses AMS.III-F methodology version 12 and reports a leakage deduction of 0% with leakage deemed negligible, but reversal handling is not addressed and no buffer pool percentage is available. The absence of a baseline reassessment date further limits confidence in long-term integrity.

Transparency

Transparency is moderate because the record identifies the verifier, the registry, and a clear monitoring period from 2024-01-01 to 2024-12-31. However, the extracted facts do not include verified ERR totals, a usage-monitoring method, or any quantified usage-rate evidence, which makes it hard to independently assess reported performance. The medium extraction confidence also suggests at least one key source was not fully legible.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is mixed. The VVB-confirmed additionality and negligible leakage claim support the project, but the project is marked CORSIA-eligible and CCP status is not stated, so dual-market claim risk is not fully resolved. The lack of verified usage-rate data and the missing baseline reassessment date also leave some over-crediting risk unresolved.

Documentation

Documentation is reasonably broad, with evidence drawn from a verification report, monitoring report, PDD, and appendix, and 20 documents were used. Still, the extraction confidence is only medium, and several important items are not stated in available documents, including buffer pool coverage, verified usage rates, and ERR totals. The crediting period is also inconsistent across documents, which reduces documentation reliability.

Overall

Overall, the project looks better than average on core additionality, but the evidence base is not clean enough for a high-confidence score. I privileged the more recent verification report over the older PDD where the crediting period differs, because it is later and more specific to the verified period; I also privileged the newer monitoring-report statement that leakage is negligible over the older report that said leakage was not addressed. The contradictions on safeguards and benefit sharing are material reliability issues, so the scores are held down despite some positive project attributes.

Audit Analysis

The project has some positive quality signals, including VVB-confirmed additionality, a negligible leakage claim, and no reported reversal events in the extracted record. However, the evidence set has meaningful gaps and contradictions, especially around safeguards, benefit sharing, and the crediting period, which reduce confidence in the documentation and claim safety.

Project Description

Developer: GoodPlanet Type: Other Size: Micro Scale Methodology: AMS-III.F. Avoidance of methane emissions through controlled biological treatment of biomass Crediting period: 2017-03-01 → 2027-02-28 Estimated annual credits: 4364 tCO2e SDGs: Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities, Goal 2: Zero Hunger, Goal 13: Climate Action, Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

Red Flags

  • The extracted record contains contradictions on safeguards, benefit sharing, leakage treatment, and the crediting period, which weakens reliability.
  • No buffer pool percentage, baseline reassessment date, or verified usage-monitoring details were found in the available documents.

Credit Vintages

Issued Retired Available
2017
2,277 2,277 0
2018
2,362 2,362 0
2019
1,546 1,546 0
2020
2,081 2,081 0
2021
3,816 3,816 0
2022
2,999 2,999 0
2023
2,873 2,873 0
2024
2,451 0 2,451
Total 20,405 17,954 2,451

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Publish a clear, reconciled evidence pack showing the final crediting period, leakage treatment, safeguards status, and benefit-sharing terms across all documents.
  • Provide verified ERR totals, a documented usage-monitoring method, baseline reassessment evidence, and buffer pool or reversal-risk treatment.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed barrier test

Permanence

No buffer pool stated

Leakage

0% deduction, justification mixed

Baseline

Project baseline, reassessment missing

Safeguards

FPIC and grievance present, but inconsistent record

Double-claim

CORSIA-eligible, CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-18 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti