CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSAgriculture Forestry and Other Land UseUgandaRegistry: RegisteredAR-ACM0001

Natural High Forest Rehabilitation Project on degraded land of Kibale National Park

Developer: PRIMAKLIMA e.V

VCS-673 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#10of 303 in Soil carbon#1of 185 in Uganda#46of 1612 in Verra (VCS)#1of 16 in AR-ACM0001

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.5 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-12medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2023-02-28

evidence: 44/49 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Natural High Forest Rehabilitation Project on degraded land of Kibale National Park (Uganda) plants or regenerates trees (afforestation, reforestation, revegetation) (reforestation with native species in tropical high forest vegetation) under AR-ACM0001 Version 05.0.0; registry status Registered (VCS), 1,079,647 credits issued (vintages 2009–2023). The documents name TÜV NORD CERT GmbH as validation / verification body. Project area: 7,076 ha. The latest verification report (01 March 2020 – 28 February 2023) verifies 123,300 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 49 registry documents (44 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Carbon removal

    Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.

    Source: methodology

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
372,381372,29685
2011
173,015173,0150
2014
229,902229,81785
2017
199,544197,2812,263
2020
29,11325,1223,991
2021
34,93534,9296
2022
34,93522,09712,838
2023
5,8225,8220
Total1,079,6471,060,37919,268

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2009–2011AR-ACM0001 v5.0since replaced by v5.2.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2011–2014AR-ACM0001 v5.0since replaced by v5.2.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2014–2017AR-ACM0001 v5.0since replaced by v5.2.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2017–2020AR-ACM0001 v5.0since replaced by v5.2.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2020–2023AR-ACM0001 v5.0since replaced by v5.2.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2020–2023AR-ACM0003 v2.0current version

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  • AR-ACM0001: Withdrawn (CDM / UNFCCC) · replaced byAR-ACM0003 · official page · verified on
  • AR-ACM0003: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAR-ACM0001 Version 05.0.0
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →