Skip to main content
ICRAvoidance / ReductionUAACM0002

Orlivska Wind Farm

ICR-237 ↗

#388of 1935 in Renewable energy#1of 8 in UA#8of 154 in Intl. Carbon Registry (ICR)#294of 1287 in ACM0002

6.0/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

The Orlivska Wind Farm is a 10-year wind energy avoidance project in Ukraine with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reversal events, but it delivered only about 41% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the monitoring period, and several key MRV and safeguards fields remain unstated. A contradiction in the baseline classification (project vs. jurisdictional) and in the ERR figures between the validation and verification documents introduces moderate data-reliability concerns. Overall the project is conservative in its credit issuance but lacks full transparency on safeguards and baseline methodology.

Red Flags

  • Verified ERR of 224,985 tCO2 is only ~41% of the pro-rata ex-ante expectation (~544,000 tCO2) for the 2.4-year monitoring period, suggesting the ex-ante activity-level assumptions were significantly optimistic or that output was constrained (e.g., grid curtailment, turbine availability, or the 2022 conflict in Ukraine).
  • Baseline method is labelled 'project' in the verification report but 'jurisdictional' in the monitoring report — an unresolved contradiction that affects baseline credibility.
  • No buffer pool percentage is stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk unquantified despite the absence of reversal events.
  • FPIC is explicitly not conducted and no grievance mechanism is documented, leaving social safeguards under-addressed for a project operating in a conflict-affected country.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2019
56,708056,708
2020
224,9860224,986
2021
224,9860224,986
2022
224,9860224,986
2023
224,9860224,986
2024
224,9860224,986
2025
224,9860224,986
2026
224,9860224,986
2027
224,9860224,986
2028
224,9860224,986
2029
168,2770168,277
Total2,249,85902,249,859

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test, VVB-confirmed

Permanence

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Leakage

0% deemed negligible, reasonable for grid-connected wind

Baseline

Project vs. jurisdictional contradiction unresolved

Safeguards

FPIC not conducted, no grievance mechanism documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-08ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents