*PRE_CDM VER Tonk Biomass Project, India
GS-1095 ↗ · current registry ID: GS628
#113of 352 in Biomass#590of 975 in India#913of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#369of 806 in AMS-I.D
Audit Analysis
The Tonk Biomass Project is a Gold Standard biomass-to-electricity project in India with a jurisdictional baseline and a combined additionality test, but the verification record contains two material contradictions (leakage justification and ERR figures) and several key integrity parameters (buffer pool, permanence, FNRB) are absent from the extracted documents. The project over-delivered relative to its ex-ante estimate for the first monitoring period, which is a positive signal, yet the 0% leakage deduction rests on a contradictory justification and five material findings with two outstanding corrective actions temper confidence in the overall integrity of the credit.
Red Flags
- Leakage justification is contradictory: the verification report (2009-09-21) states leakage was 'quantified' while the monitoring report (2009-10-06) states it was 'deemed negligible', yet the deduction applied is 0% — a quantified assessment should yield a defensible non-zero figure or an explicit quantified zero.
- Five material findings were raised in the verification report, including generation exceeding the 8 MW nameplate capacity by 0.75% in some months and missing documentation of regional biomass availability, with two corrective actions still required.
- No buffer pool percentage, permanence claim duration, or reversal-event history is stated in any available document, leaving the permanence and reversal-risk picture entirely unverified.
- Additionality test type is recorded as 'combined' but explicit VVB confirmation of the additionality assessment is not stated in the extracted record.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 9,669 | 9,668 | 1 | |
| 2008 | 30,477 | 28,004 | 2,473 | |
| Total | 40,146 | 37,672 | 2,474 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test stated but VVB confirmation not explicit
mixed evidence / unresolved risk
0% deduction with contradictory justification
Jurisdictional baseline but no reassessment date
Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not stated
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →