Skip to main content
VCSAgriculture Forestry and Other Land UseBrazil Registry: RegisteredGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Productive Second Floor with Macaúba

VCS-4137 ↗

#35of 261 in Soil carbon#35of 211 in Brazil#359of 1339 in Verra (VCS)

5.6/ 10
Integrity
6.2
Transparency
4.8
Claim Safety
5.8
Documentation
5.2

Audit Analysis

A 40-year VCS ALM soil-carbon project in Brazil using Macaúba on degraded pasture, validated by Carbon Check with a 21% buffer pool and VVB-confirmed additionality. The project shows solid structural safeguards but carries moderate risk from a project-specific baseline, a 0% leakage deduction with contradictory justification across validation documents, and the absence of any monitoring-period data to verify delivery against the 143,019 tCO₂e claim.

Red Flags

  • Leakage justification is contradictory: the 2025-06-25 validation report records it as 'not addressed' while the 2025-05-02 validation report records it as 'deemed negligible', yet the 0% deduction is retained in both
  • No monitoring period or monitoring report data is available in the extracted record, so the 143,019 tCO₂e figure cannot be cross-checked against a pro-rata expectation for an elapsed period
  • Minimum extraction confidence is rated low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable, which undermines confidence in the completeness of the evidence base

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

21% buffer, no reversals, 40-yr period

Leakage

0% deduction, contradictory justification

Baseline

Project-specific, no reassessment date

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, safeguards documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both unstated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents