CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
Re-assessment pendingGSOtherNew CaledoniaRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Prony and Kafeate wind-farms, New Caledonia (300344)

Developer: South Pole Ltd

GS-1001 ↗ · current registry ID: GS566

Worked comparison example (English)

#1325of 2172 in Gold Standard (GS)#2540of 3484 in ACM0002

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 5 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.9 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-09-05medium confidenceLatest monitoring period ends: 2022-04-19

evidence: 29/31 registry documents analyzed · 4 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

A Gold Standard wind-farm project in New Caledonia with VVB-verified additionality and safeguards in place, but undermined by an extensive list of calculation errors, metering issues, and calibration gaps identified across multiple verification cycles. The most recent verification report leaves leakage justification unaddressed and reversal events unassessed, while the baseline method is inconsistently described across documents. The project delivered roughly 90% of its pro-rata ex-ante expectation for the latest monitoring period, indicating modest under-delivery rather than over-crediting.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 5 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 31 registry documents (29 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2008
17,28517,2850
2009
29,61929,6190
2010
38,81138,8110
2011
33,52833,5280
2012
42,45942,4590
2013
38,77438,74133
2014
42,64741,747900
2015
42,34041,613727
2016
32,79731,6901,107
2017
32,07929,9332,146
2018
32,88628,3864,500
2019
43,52343,5230
2020
37,42237,4220
2021
34,09434,0940
2022
9,6419,6410
Total507,905498,4929,413

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2008–2010ACM0002the documents for this period state different versions (v7.0, v9.0)

    monitoring report + verification report

  2. 2010–2011ACM0002 v7.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2011–2012ACM0002 v7.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2012–2014ACM0002 v9.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2012–2015ACM0002 v7.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2016–2018ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2019–2020ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2021–2022ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →