Skip to main content
VCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources)United States Registry: RegisteredACM0002

Reading Wind Energy, LLC

VCS-1754 ↗

#276of 1935 in Renewable energy#46of 345 in United States#131of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#204of 1287 in ACM0002

6.2/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
6.0
Claim Safety
7.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

Reading Wind Energy is a straightforward VCS wind project with solid additionality (VVB-confirmed investment test), a jurisdictional baseline, and no inherent permanence risk. However, the extracted record contains numerous contradictions between documents, material findings that appear to originate from a different project, and a low extraction confidence rating, which collectively undermine confidence in the data integrity of the available documentation.

Red Flags

  • Multiple material findings reference fuel type codes (WDS, BQL, OBL, etc.), a landfill gas collection system, and operating/built margin calculations that are inapplicable to a wind energy project, suggesting data from a different project was mixed into the record
  • FPIC status is simultaneously recorded as conducted and not conducted within the same verification report (2024-04-18), an internal contradiction that cannot be resolved from available documents
  • Nine distinct contradictions between documents, including baseline method (jurisdictional vs. project-specific), leakage justification (quantified vs. not addressed), and grievance mechanism presence, reducing confidence in the factual record
  • Min extraction confidence rated as low, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable during data extraction

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2020
241,6860241,686
2021
451,6940451,694
2022
478,5950478,595
2023
424,5030424,503
2024
456,1490456,149
Total2,052,62702,052,627

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

Wind project – no reversal risk

Leakage

0% deduction; justification contradicted between docs

Baseline

Jurisdictional per VVB; monitoring report says project-specific

Safeguards

FPIC contradicted within same report; grievance mechanism inconsistent across years

Double-claim

CORSIA not eligible; CCP status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-03ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents