Renewable Power Project by Axis Wind Farms (MPR Dam) Private Limited
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified The verification report confirms additionality through an investment test and says the VVB verified it.
missing Leakage is marked as not addressed in the latest verification record, and no buffer pool percentage or reversal history is stated.
Transparency
verified The monitoring period and the verified emission reductions are stated in the verification report, and the claimed and verified totals match at 441,973.
missing The extraction confidence is low, the evidence document list is not informative, and the usage monitoring method is not stated.
Claim Safety
verified The project is not CORSIA-eligible, which reduces dual-market claim risk, and the verified reductions equal the claimed reductions in the latest report.
missing The baseline is project-specific rather than jurisdictional, and leakage treatment is weak or absent in the latest record.
Documentation
verified Twenty-three documents were used, and the latest verification report is dated 2023, which is reasonably recent relative to the crediting period.
missing At least one key document had low extraction confidence, and the record leaves several fields unstated, including buffer pool, baseline reassessment, and usage monitoring.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The verification report dated 2023-08-24 confirms additionality through an investment test and says VKU Certification Pvt. Ltd. verified it. The project is a renewable power activity, and no reversal events are reported, but the record does not state any buffer pool percentage and the latest report says leakage is not addressed. The corrective action note also says the apportioning formula for December 2020 still needed explanation, which slightly weakens confidence in the accounting.
Transparency
The latest verification report provides a clear monitoring period from 2021-01-01 to 2022-12-31 and reports 441,973 verified emission reductions, matching the claimed amount. However, the usage monitoring method is not stated, and the extracted record indicates low extraction confidence for at least one key document. The evidence list is not informative, so public-facing traceability is only moderate.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is helped by the fact that the verified and claimed emission reductions are identical in the latest verification report, which reduces immediate over-issuance concern. Still, the baseline is project-specific rather than a more conservative jurisdictional baseline, and leakage is not addressed in the latest record. The project is explicitly not CORSIA-eligible, which lowers dual-claim risk, but the overall accounting conservatism remains only moderate.
Documentation
The file set is fairly broad, with 23 documents used and a recent verification report dated 2023-08-24. Even so, the extraction confidence is low, and several important items are not stated in available documents, including buffer pool coverage, baseline reassessment timing, and usage monitoring details. The corrective action request about the December 2020 apportioning formula also suggests the documentation is not fully clean.
Overall
I privileged the latest verification report for the emission reduction totals and leakage wording because it is the most recent and authoritative document in the record. That means the verified and claimed totals of 441,973 are treated as current, while the earlier 203,168 figure is treated as superseded by the later report. The contradictions around FPIC, benefit sharing, grievance mechanisms, and ER totals indicate a mixed-quality file set, so the scores are held to a moderate level rather than a high one.
Audit Analysis
This is a registered wind power project with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reported reversals, which supports a moderate integrity profile. However, the record has several reliability gaps and contradictions, including changed ER totals across documents, a leakage treatment that is not clearly addressed, and low extraction confidence from at least one source.
Project Description
Proponent: Axis Wind Farms (MPR Dam) Private Limited Protocol categories: Energy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources) Protocols: ACM0002 Estimated annual GHG reductions: 195052 tCO2e Region: Asia Registration date: 2018-08-14
Red Flags
- The record shows contradictions in reported emission reductions and in social safeguard fields across documents, which weakens confidence in the file set.
- Leakage is not clearly treated in the latest verification record, and the corrective action note says the December 2020 apportioning formula still needed explanation.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 139,767 | 139,016 | 751 | |
| 2018 | 214,977 | 124,953 | 90,024 | |
| 2019 | 208,939 | 190,114 | 18,825 | |
| 2020 | 184,343 | 100,531 | 83,812 | |
| 2021 | 217,782 | 0 | 217,782 | |
| 2022 | 224,191 | 0 | 224,191 | |
| Total | 1,189,999 | 554,614 | 635,385 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Provide a clear leakage assessment or quantified deduction, with an explanation of why leakage is negligible for this project type.
- Resolve the contradictory social and emissions figures by publishing a reconciled audit trail that explains which document values are superseded and why.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
No reversals reported
Leakage not addressed
Project baseline only
FPIC and grievance mechanism present
Not CORSIA-eligible
Where to buy
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →