CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredVCSAgriculture Forestry and Other Land UseColombiaRegistry: Registered

Restoration of degraded areas and reforestation in Cáceres and Cravo Norte, Colombia

Developer: Asorpar Ltd

VCS-576 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#29of 303 in Soil carbon#10of 214 in Colombia#134of 1612 in Verra (VCS)

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.9 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-10-12medium confidenceLatest verified period ends: 2021-07-30

evidence: 25/29 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

Restoration of degraded areas and reforestation in Cáceres and Cravo Norte, Colombia (Colombia) plants or regenerates trees (afforestation, reforestation, revegetation) (reforestation with 16 native tree species as well as small percentages of Gmelina arborea and Acacia mangium) under AR-ACM0003 Version 2.01; registry status Registered (VCS), 404,539 credits issued (vintages 2002–2021). The documents name KBS Certification Services Ltd as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (21-August-2014 – 30-July-2021) verifies 77,750 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 29 registry documents (25 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Carbon removal

    Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2002
7,1347,1340
2003
7,1347,1340
2004
7,9757,9750
2005
9,6259,6250
2006
16,94116,9410
2007
19,45519,4550
2008
20,31720,3170
2009
20,16020,1564
2010
20,16020,1600
2011
63,90962,6461,263
2012
63,90963,9036
2013
63,90963,651258
2014
46,39946,30594
2015
11,37811,3780
2016
11,37811,3780
2018
11,0289,2351,793
2021
3,7283,608120
Total404,539401,0013,538

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2002–2010AR-AM0005 v3.0since replaced by v4.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2002–2010AR-AM0005 v3.0since replaced by v4.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2011–2014AR-ACM0003the documents for this period state different versions (v2.0, v2.1)

    monitoring report + verification report

  4. 2014–2021AR-ACM0003 v2.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. Period not statedAR-ACM0003 v2.0current version

    issuance document

    official page · verified on

  • AR-ACM0003: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AR-AM0005: Withdrawn (CDM / UNFCCC) · replaced byAR-ACM0003 · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+2)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGeneral Methodologyv2.2
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →