CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

No public grade applies yet

Rice husk based power generation project by MECBL at Raigarh

Standard
CDM
Methodology
AMS-I.D (CDM)
Registry
CDM-3591 ↗ · Registered
Country
India
Credit type
Biomass Energy
Developer
Mahavir Energy and Coal Benefication Ltd
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives Rice husk based power generation project by MECBL at Raigarh (CDM-3591) no number (No public grade applies yet): CarbonMeld read its documents, but its type of project does not yet have a public grade that applies to it on both additionality and quantification. The absence of a number says nothing about the project's quality.

Assessment

Document-based rating

No public grade applies yet

No public source has yet given this type of project grades on both additionality and quantification that apply here. CarbonMeld read this project's documents. The analysis is below. The page can receive a number once a public grade of its type of project applies on both additionality and quantification. The absence of a number says nothing about the project's quality.

Evidence coverage: medium

Methodology v3 · documents read on 29 Oct 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: no public grade of this type of project applies
  • Quantification: no public grade of this type of project applies
  • Claim safety: no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that raise a dimension: 1

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Not counted by the method

  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read
  • The ICVCM's decision: the ICVCM decided on this methodology only for other programmes, not for this project's programme
  • Additionality and quantification: CCQI's tool has no type of project for this activity

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · About the System

How this analysis was made

Standard
CDM (UNFCCC) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
AMS I D version 13 How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 29 Oct 2026

Eligibility & market

Under decision 4/CMP.20 of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (FCCC/KP/CMP/2025/7/Add.1, paragraph 5), the submission of requests for issuance of new CERs was discontinued as of 30 June 2026; requests to transfer CERs to the Article 6.4 mechanism registry, cancellations and any other transactions in the CDM registry are discontinued as of 31 December 2026. The UNEP-CCC Article 6 Pipeline (checked 2 Nov 2026) lists a request to move this activity to the Article 6.4 mechanism and no approval of it; approvals were due by 30 June 2026 (decision 20/CMA.7, paragraph 25). This page keeps the project's record.

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
38,833038,833
2022
466,3300466,330
Total505,1630505,163

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2011–2012AMS-I.D v13.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2012–2021AMS-I.D v13.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-I.D: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Report an error on this page

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Report an error on this page

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Report an error on this page →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Rice husk based power generation project by MECBL at Raigarh (CDM-3591): CarbonMeld document-based analysis, methodology v3, documents read on 29 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/rice-husk-based-power-generation-project-by-mecbl-at-raigarh/.

The citation names the analysis by its methodology version and the day the documents were read; the page gives no number.

Unlock the full analysis

Every rule that applies to the project, each with its fact, its quote, its source and, where it has them, its points; the detail and quotes of the negative facts; and 10 registry documents (8 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.