Skip to main content
GSBiomass, or Liquid Biofuel - CogenerationTurkeyGeneral Methodologyv2.1

SÜTAS TIRE BIOGAS PLANT

GS-851 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4817

#85of 352 in Biomass#191of 295 in Turkey#642of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)

5.2/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.5
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
6.0

Audit Analysis

The Sütas Tire Biogas Plant is a Gold Standard manure-to-biogas project with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test, but it carries moderate integrity and transparency risks due to a project-specific modeled baseline, a thin 0% leakage justification, the absence of a buffer pool, and a significant discrepancy between the original PDD lifetime estimate (574,257 tCO₂e) and the later monitoring-report figure (206,361 tCO₂e). No verified ERR figure is available in the extracted record, and several key MRV parameters (FNRB, usage monitoring method, CORSIA/CCP status) are not stated, limiting the ability to independently assess over-crediting risk.

Red Flags

  • The PDD (2020) reports a lifetime ex-ante estimate of 574,257 tCO₂e while the monitoring report (2024) reports 206,361 tCO₂e — a 64% reduction that is not explained in the available documents.
  • No verified ERR figure is present in the extracted record; only the claimed figure of 197,821 tCO₂e (monitoring report, 2025) is available, preventing an independent over- or under-delivery check.
  • Leakage is set at 0% with only a 'deemed negligible' justification in the verification report, while the earlier validation report (2024) did not address leakage at all — a thin basis for a biogas/digester project where methane slip is a known risk.
  • 61 Corrective Action Requests and 11 Clarification Requests were raised during validation (all subsequently closed), indicating substantial initial documentation and design weaknesses.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test

Permanence

reversal not explicitly addressed in verification

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' only; not addressed in validation

Baseline

Project-specific, modeled; no reassessment date stated

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present; FPIC not stated

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-06General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents