Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
ScoredVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalThailandRegistry: RegisteredAMS-III.H

SD Biosupply Wastewater Treatment and Biogas Utilization Project

Developer: SD Biosupply Co. Ltd

VCS-416 ↗

#17of 523 in Biogas#7of 139 in Thailand#283of 1584 in Verra (VCS)#3of 142 in AMS-III.H

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.8 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

SD Biosupply Wastewater Treatment and Biogas Utilization Project (Thailand) recovers methane from wastewater treatment (open flaring system with a default flare efficiency of 50%) under AMS-III.H and AMS-I.C; registry status Registered (VCS), 522,618 credits issued (vintages 2006–2022). The documents name RINA Services S.p.A (RINA) as validator of the crediting-period renewal and Germanischer Lolyd Certification GmbH (2009-01-01 – 2012-05-31), Germanischer Lloyd Certification GmbH (2009-01-01 – 2012-05-31), RINA Services S.p.A (RINA) (2012-06-01 – 2014-09-14, 2014-09-15 – 2016-03-27), KBS Certification Services Pvt. Ltd (2016-03-28 – 2016-12-31, 2017-01-01 – 2019-12-31), TÜV NORD CERT GmbH (2020-01-01 – 2020-03-02, 2020-03-03 – 2021-04-30), LGAI Technological Center S.A. (Applus+ Certification) (2021-05-01 – 2022-10-31) as verification bodies. The documents estimate 51,316 tCO2e per year. The latest verification report (01-May-2021 – 31-October-2022) verifies 68,840 tCO2e. The project also includes an energy component under AMS-I.C, not assessed here.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 41 registry documents (32 read).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
8,8638,8630
2008
12,6926,2740
2009
34,31134,3110
2010
24,47524,4750
2011
27,88127,8810
2012
28,32728,3270
2013
29,35029,3500
2014
38,00238,0020
2015
35,95535,9550
2016
49,47549,4750
2017
60,14958,5581,591
2018
36,29236,2920
2019
37,03237,0320
2020
40,69640,6960
2021
49,38737,01912,368
2022
9,7311,8097,922
Total522,618494,31921,881

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2006–2008AMS-I.C v14.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2006–2008AMS-III.H v12.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2009–2012AMS-I.C v14.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2009–2012AMS-III.H v12.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2012–2014AMS-III.H v12.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2016AMS-III.Hversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  7. 2017–2019AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2020AMS-I.C v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2020AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  10. 2020–2021AMS-I.C v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  11. 2020–2021AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  12. 2021–2022AMS-I.C v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  13. 2021–2022AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-I.C: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-III.H: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+1)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS-III.H and AMS-I.C

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →