Shuicheng Rural Methane Digesters Project in Guizhou Province
GS-450 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2641
#143of 268 in Biogas#776of 1084 in China#1101of 1801 in Gold Standard (GS)#43of 115 in AMS-I.C
Audit Analysis
The Shuicheng Rural Methane Digesters Project is a Gold Standard biogas avoidance project with a confirmed combined additionality test and VVB-verified emissions reductions, but it carries significant technical and documentation concerns. Eight material findings—including non-compliant GWP and MCF values, a methodology validity gap, and an outdated PDD form—along with 19 corrective actions indicate substantial quality-control weaknesses. The verified ERR for the 2022 monitoring period (154,241 tCO₂e) is roughly three times the pro-rata annual expectation derived from the lifetime ex-ante estimate, raising over-crediting questions that the VVB's verification does not fully resolve.
Red Flags
- GWP for methane (applied in PDD) and MCF value (12.8 °C) were found non-compliant with EB 69 Annex 3 and IPCC 2006 Table 10.17 respectively, directly affecting the credit calculation
- Methodology AMS-I.C was not valid at the time of the original registration request, a fundamental eligibility concern
- Verified ERR of 154,241 tCO₂e for the 2022 monitoring period is approximately 308% of the pro-rata annual expectation (~50,113 tCO₂e) derived from the 501,130 tCO₂e lifetime ex-ante estimate over a 10-year crediting period
- 19 corrective actions were required across the monitoring report, indicating widespread documentation and calculation gaps
- FPIC was not conducted and the stakeholder feedback round was not reported in the Passport, despite a grievance mechanism being in place
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 33,887 | 33,887 | 0 | |
| 2014 | 50,013 | 49,363 | 650 | |
| 2015 | 50,080 | 49,098 | 982 | |
| 2016 | 49,989 | 29,503 | 20,486 | |
| Total | 183,969 | 161,851 | 22,118 |
Risk Indicators
Combined test VVB-confirmed (2021) but 2017 VR recorded as unverified; methodology validity gap at registration
no reversal events reported but risk unaddressed
0% deduction with quantified justification (2021) but earlier report recorded as not addressed
Project-specific modeled baseline; no reassessment date found; GWP and MCF values were non-compliant
Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present; FPIC not conducted; stakeholder feedback round not reported
CCP status and CORSIA eligibility both not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →