Vai al contenuto principale
VCS Energy demand India Registry: Registered Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

SMG - Cookstove Program 3

VCS-3771 ↗

7.1 / 10
Integrity
6.4
Transparency
8.2
Claim Safety
6.1
Documentation
8.8

Score Breakdown

Integrity

verified Applus+ verification confirms 67,652 tCO2e for 01-Dec-2022 to 30-Jun-2023 [Verification Report]

inferred Cookstove-specific risks remain: sustained use, fNRB, and leakage controls are not fully visible in the excerpt [Verification Report]

Transparency

verified Public registry extract includes validation/verification representations, validation report, verification report, and monitoring report

verified Verification report provides dates, methodology (VMR0006), site visit, CAR/CL closure, and project scale [Verification Report]

Claim Safety

verified Recent verification period and issue date reduce vintage risk [Verification Report]

inferred No evidence shown of CCP label, corresponding adjustment, or Article 6 authorization; claims should remain VCM-only

Documentation

verified Multiple official documents are publicly accessible on the registry, including a 97-page verification report

verified Monitoring period and verification period are clearly stated; CARs/CLs were resolved [Verification Report]

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

The verification report (issued 19-Sep-2024) states Applus+ independently validated and verified the project under VMR0006 and confirmed 67,652 tCO2e for 01-Dec-2022 to 30-Jun-2023, with 30,000 ICS distributed in Madhya Pradesh. That supports additionality and implementation, but the excerpt does not show the full additionality test details, nor does it provide the underlying fNRB value or sustained-use evidence beyond sampling and site visit procedures. For a cookstove project, usage persistence and baseline fuel assumptions are key risks; the report mentions random household sampling and conservative assumptions, but the visible text does not quantify leakage or stove-stacking controls.

Transparency

Public registry documents are unusually strong here: validation representation, verification representation, verification report, validation report, and monitoring report are all present in the registry extract. The verification report is detailed, includes dates, methodology references, site visit, and findings resolution, which materially improves transparency. Some underlying annexes and the full monitoring report text are not visible in the provided excerpt, so transparency is high but not perfect.

Claim Safety

The project is on VCS (VCS 3771) with a recent verification period ending 30-Jun-2023 and report issued 19-Sep-2024, so vintage risk is moderate rather than high. There is no evidence in the provided material of CCP approval, Article 6 authorization, or corresponding adjustment, so buyer claims should be limited to standard voluntary carbon market claims, not compliance or offsetting with host-country adjustment assurances. Double-counting risk appears managed through the Verra registry framework, but the excerpt does not show retirement records or buyer claim guidance.

Documentation

The evidence package includes a public validation report, verification report, validation/verification representations, and a monitoring report, all linked to the official registry. The verification report is recent and explicitly covers the monitored period 01-Dec-2022 to 30-Jun-2023, with a 97-page report and documented CAR/CL closure. The only notable gap is that the excerpt does not expose the full monitoring report content or all annexes, so some technical assumptions remain unreviewed in this assessment.

Overall

Overall, this is a relatively well-documented registry-grade project with a recent independent verification and clear issuance-era evidence, which supports a solid transparency and documentation score. The score is held below the top tier because cookstove projects are inherently sensitive to usage persistence, baseline fuel assumptions, and leakage/fuel stacking, and those details are not fully visible in the excerpt. The verification report is the strongest evidence and confirms the project was audited, but it does not fully eliminate methodological uncertainty. For a buyer, this is a credible VCS cookstove crediting project, but not one that can be treated as low-risk or best-in-class without deeper MRV disclosure.

Audit Analysis

This is a registry-grade VCS cookstove project with a public validation/verification trail, so confidence is relatively high. The main uncertainty is not documentation but methodological risk typical of cookstoves: usage, fNRB, and baseline conservatism are only partially visible in the excerpted report text.

Project Description

Proponent: Shri Maa Marketing Private Limited Protocol categories: Energy demand Protocols: VMR0006 Estimated annual GHG reductions: 90249 tCO2e Region: Asia Registration date: 2024-10-22

Red Flags

  • Cookstove methodology risk: the excerpt does not show annual sustained-usage results, stove-stacking controls, or metered usage evidence.
  • Baseline/fNRB details are not visible in the excerpt, so over-crediting risk from biomass access assumptions cannot be fully assessed.
  • No evidence shown of corresponding adjustment or Article 6 authorization; buyer claims should not imply host-country adjusted mitigation.

Credit Vintages

Nessuna emissione registrata sul registro.

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Publish the full monitoring report annexes showing fNRB calculation, stove-usage survey results, and sustained-use rates by monitoring period.
  • Disclose leakage treatment and any fuel-stacking adjustment methodology in a registry-linked MRV appendix.
  • Provide buyer-facing claim guidance and any Article 6/corresponding-adjustment status statement, if applicable.

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

documented evidence

Permanence

low reversal risk for non-AFOLU cookstove project

Leakage

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Baseline

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Safeguards

documented evidence

Double-claim

mixed evidence / unresolved risk

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-08 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti